The Sin & The Self
A whore, a queer and a hangman... how do they define sin?
"Mahtma Budhh once accepted water from the hand of a prostitute and so told that her profession does not condemn her to untouchability or hatred rather society has to be condemned for the origin of such profession."
‘Sin’ is defined too much impractical and conflicting... and in most of the times it appears an artificial work of humanity. For example ‘a killing’ is sin but ‘an honour killing’? I guess society have devised this term ‘sin’ for the benevolence of the whole social system and so it has nothing to do with the God. To be more specific, I must say ‘sin’ is nothing without society... it has no existence at all. When we live alone, we never find our self guilty for any of our deeds. While being alone everything gets decided on the basis of likeness and unlikeness, here comes no question of measuring the task on the scale of sin.
Being alone is being holy... social structure marinates the holy blood with dirtiest things they have devised. Fatwa, Sati, Dowry, Caste and gender prejudice are few such stupidity which is grossly unjustified.
Actually, in the run of making everything more comfortable, humanity turned out to be trapped in its own complex matrix of religions, nations and ownerships. Ugliest is that the very individual self is becoming the scapegoat of it! In the era where education has reached to a maximum number of brains and these brains are now capable of understanding the true picture of this complex matrix, it is becoming revoltingly tough sustain the power of sin.
I long to see those days when others will have minimum interference in the family matters of one and families will have no fear of being offended by the so called relatives, society and town... Oh Lord, your true existence is shielded. Kindly extend your hand to help me in breaking out this shield... Amen!